عنوان مقاله [English]
Article 1212 of the Civil Code considers the non-gratuitous possessions of a minor auditor to be valid and effective, while from the point of view of legal jurisprudential principles, the validity of the possessions of a minor auditor has been questioned.
Citing narrated evidences such as the hadith of elimination and rational evidences and proving that the minor does not have the authority to possess, and therefore the intention of possessing about him is eliminated and his possessions are not valid and effective.
On the other hand, some believe that his possessions are correct, citing the authenticity and proof of possession for the minor.
In this research, which has been done in a descriptive-analytical method and with reference to library sources, we have examined the evidence of 2 opinions and we have come to the conclusion that minor seizures are not valid and effective and minor seizures have not been possessed, so the content of the article is necessary. 1212 The Civil Code is being revised