Modern Jurisprudence and Law

Modern Jurisprudence and Law

Comparative Analysis of Transportation of the UAE in the eyes of Imamiyyah and Sunnis, approach and challenges

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
manoochehr khodarahmi 1
said khodadadi 2
ebrahim momeni 3
hossain rezaii 4
1 Ph.D. Student of Razavi Criminal Sciences Level 4 and Special Secretary of the Scientific Journal of Principles of Principles
2 استادیار دانشگاه لرستان/ دانش آموخته سطح 4 حوزه علمیه قم
3 Doctoral student of Islamic Studies, Islamic Ethics, Qom University of Islamic Studies
4 Doctoral student of Qur'an and Hadith
10.22034/jml.2023.706842
Abstract
Explaining the concept of the UAE, examining the foundations, and its arguments, one of the most important issues in the principle of jurisprudence, which has a special place in the fundamental headings of the principles of jurisprudence, while the widespread geography of this debate in cases where the Farrinian view is due to the UAE. The comparison and critique of their arguments in a comprehensive way in the eyes of Ferravine is not carefully explored. This study, in a descriptive-analytical way, relying on library resources and the votes of the Imamiyyah and Sunni elders, sought to answer the question of what is the argument of the UAE's preference for the Farrzin principles? The results of the present study proved that most Sunni scholars believe that some Sunni jurists have been approved. Among the jurisprudents of the Imamiyyah, although most of them are in favor of the theory of violations, many also believe in the UAE's reason, so that the result is a violation, and each group has cited some verses and narrations to prove their claim.
Keywords
The cause of the Imamate
the approval
the principles of jurisprudence
the violation
Subjects