Due to the secrecy and widespread criminal applications of Haarp technology, the criminal policy of governments in this regard has remained silent and has not been criminalized, but because these applications are more in line with the complete violation of human rights, accordingly criminalization. It will be of great importance to human societies. One of the ways in which governments can criminalize these practices is by invoking the rules of jurisprudence. The main purpose of this article is to investigate the criminalization of criminal applications of Haarp technology with reference to the rules of jurisprudence. The research method in this paper is descriptive and analytical and the data collection is library. The findings of the study indicate that criminalizing Haarp's criminal activities is the best way to prevent it, and because the holy Shari'a of Islam has rules and regulations for all actions, the legislature can rely on those rules to To criminalize it. The rules of no harm and no harm in Islam, negation of the mustache and rule of obligation to repel possible harm as the most important jurisprudential rules, can help governments to criminalize the criminal activities of this technology.