Bribes to judges are one of the most important legal harm in the jurisprudence of Imam. Bribes have been banned in the jurisprudence of the jurisprudence of the judges that clearly lead to injustice and discrimination. On the other hand, another discussion that can be linked to the judges is the gift to the judge. An important question among jurists is whether the gift to judges also bribed? In this case, the jurists are different, but they seem to be able to bring them under a rule, and that, if the purpose and intention of the gift from granting the gift, a grant gift will also be the title of bribes and regrets. Thus, the same sentences will run against Rachy. In addition to granting gifts, the transaction with the judge in the intention of the regrets is also considered to be a bribe for judges in the jurisprudence of Imam, and therefore the ruling of this case is also the same as the gift sentence. Another point is that both behaviors (gifts and transactions) are considered as a crime against criminal judicial justice in the lawyers' discourse, but so far, so far as a particular crime, the differential crime is not subject to the legal system of our country, which is a great defect. For the legal system of our country.